초록 close

This essay deals with two trends of holiness theologies in the second half of the 20th century; ceremonial and relational theories of sanctifications. The ceremonial sanctification is identified with ontological experience of holiness through the Divine Spirit in the conditions of consecration and belief. The relational sanctification is identified with the right-relational experience of God in religio-ethical dimension. The primary purpose of this essay is to elaborate for a possible theological fusion of horizon of two theological standpoints for newly emerging post-modern epoch. What this essay tries to submit is that the relational sanctification is limited in religio-spiritual dimension unlike the ceremonial sanctification, because it emphasizes ethical relationship with God and deals little with the experience of the fullness of the Spirit. The core religious dimension of Christianity is transcendental, spiritual, and sacred experience of God and transformation of the self. The theory of ceremonial sanctification needs to utilize the elucidations of love, which was identified with the right relationship with God, namely, entire sanctification in the relational theory. The ceremonial is rather a state or a mode of being, and the relational, which emphasizes the love, is closer to a mode of action. The sanctification and love are actually an identical religious experience, so that being and action should be equally emphasized. Another conspicuous aspect of the debate between two is the issue of gradual and instantaneous experience of entire sanctification. What this essay submit is that sanctification is both instantaneous and gradual events, which actually Wesley postulated in the writings. The entire sanctification is momentary event, but it demands gradual development before and after the event. Finally, it claims that both ceremonial and relational theories need to go beyond foundationalism of Wesleyan theological system.