초록 close

다수의 사건이 신속히 진행되는 보전처분 절차의 특성상 통일된 기준과 원칙 없이 보전처분 사건이 처리되는 경우가 종종 있음에도, 이에 관한 명확 한 이론이나 대법원 판례가 부족하여 실무상 혼선을 빚는 경우가 있다. 그 중에서도 보전처분의 집행은 그 중요성에도 불구하고 법관과 실무자들 사이 의 정보소통의 부족 등으로 집행 현실과 괴리된 보전처분 결정이 나오는 예 도 드물지 않게 발생한다. 따라서 보전처분의 집행과 관련하여 실무상 문제 가 될 수 있는 쟁점을 실무적인 측면에서 검토하여 사건을 처리하는 실무가 들이 그러한 사례를 실제 마주쳤을 때 참고가 될 수 있도록 하고자 한다. 먼저 미등기 건물의 보전처분과 관련하여, 현재 민사집행법은 완성되지 않은 건물에 대하여도 간이한 절차를 통하여 소유권보존등기를 마칠 수 있 는 길을 열어놓고 있다. 그러나 이는 강제집행이 필요한 채권자의 권리를 보호하기 위해 등기법상 및 행정상의 이익을 일부 포기하는 것이므로 남용 되지 않고 정확하게 운용될 수 있도록 주의하여야 한다. 따라서 미등기부동 산의 보전처분에 필요한 서류나 절차 및 그 과정에서 문제되는 쟁점을 건물 의 건축단계별로 나누어 보전처분을 담당하는 실무가들의 관점에서 실무에 바로 적용할 수 있도록 서술하고, 그 과정에서 가장 중요하다고 할 수 있는 집행관에 대한 현황조사명령에 관하여 따로 살펴보았다. 다음으로 간접강제결정 및 배상금의 집행과 관련하여, 부작위를 명하는 가처분에서 그 집행기간을 어떻게 기산하여야 할 것인지에 관한 문제를 중 심으로 서술하였다. 2주의 집행기간을 정한 민사집행법 제292조 제2항 규정 이 부작위를 명하는 가처분에는 적용이 안 되는 것인지, 아니면 채무자의 위법행위시부터 기산된다고 보아 위반행위가 계속되고 있는 경우에는 가처 분결정의 송달일로부터 기산하여야 하는 것인지에 관하여 학설과 판례, 그 리고 하급심 실무례를 검토하여 타당한 결론을 위해 함께 고민할 수 있도록 하였다. 나아가 가처분이 취소되었을 경우 이미 집행권원을 취득한 간접강 제결정도 취소되어 배상금의 집행을 더 이상 할 수 없는 부당한 결과가 초 래되는 바, 간접강제 결정에서의 실효성 있는 배상금 집행방법을 고민하고, 회계장부 열람·등사 가처분에서 나타나는 간접강제결정에서의 문제점을 함께 살펴보았다. 그리고 마지막으로 실무상 가장 용이하게 발령되는 가처분 중 하나이면 서 채무자 권익에 많은 영향을 미칠 수 있는 점유이전금지가처분에 있어서, 특히 자동차나 유체동산에 관한 점유이전금지가처분의 집행과정에서 마주 칠 수 있는 몇 가지 실무상 쟁점에 관하여 간략하게 살펴보았다.


As preliminary injunction is often conducted without unified standard and principal regarding a preliminary injunction procedure because of its characteristic of speedy process, confusions or problems have risen in practice. In particular, owing to the lack of information and communications between judges and practitioners, execution of a preliminary injunction, despite its importance, sometimes caused the court to issue determinations of preliminary injunction which are alienated from enforcement reality. Therefore, this thesis examines some issues inconnection with enforcement of preliminary injunction which may cause dispute from practical perspective, in hope of future references by practitioners facing relevant cases. With regard to preliminary injunction on an unregistered real estate, the current Civil Enforcement Act opens the way to finish an ownership preservation registry on buildings not in complete construction through simple procedure. But as this forsakes some interests in the registry law and administrative affairs, attention should be given to this as not to be abused, and applied correctly. Hence, this thesis explains necessary documents or procedures to get preliminary injunction on an unregistered real estate. It also deals some issues during the process, depending on buildings on construction, stage by stage, from practitioners perspectives so they can apply to these problems they face immediately and expecially to deal with inspection order of the status quo of the object by an executor separate from other processes as this is the most important issue. With regard to determination of indirect compulsory execution and execution of reparations thereof, this thesis explains how to calculate execution period in preliminary injunction ordering obligation of forbearance. Topics, such as whether the provision of Article 292 item 2 setting execution period of 2 weeks can be applied to preliminary injunction ordering obligation of forbearance, or otherwise this period deemed as starting from the time of infringement, when infringement continues, should be calculated as to start from delivery date of determination of a preliminary injunction or not, are introduced in this thesis with a view to draw appropriate conclusions after reviewing theories, rulings of cases and precedents in lower courts. Furthermore, as when preliminary injunction is cancelled, which makes the determinationof an entitlement of enforcement based on the preliminary injunction cancelled and makes an execution of reparations unable to enforce, unreasonable consequence eventually occurs, this thesis reviews how to effectively enforce reparations based on determinations of indirect compulsory execution and some problems regarding determination of indirect compulsory execution arising from preliminary injunction of inspection and copy on an account book. Lastly, with regard to provisional injunction against deliverance possession which is one of most easily issued preliminary injunctions in practice and affects the interest of a debtor, this thesis studies briefly some practical issues facing in the process of enforcement of provisional injunction against deliverance of possession, especially on cars or corporal movables.


As preliminary injunction is often conducted without unified standard and principal regarding a preliminary injunction procedure because of its characteristic of speedy process, confusions or problems have risen in practice. In particular, owing to the lack of information and communications between judges and practitioners, execution of a preliminary injunction, despite its importance, sometimes caused the court to issue determinations of preliminary injunction which are alienated from enforcement reality. Therefore, this thesis examines some issues inconnection with enforcement of preliminary injunction which may cause dispute from practical perspective, in hope of future references by practitioners facing relevant cases. With regard to preliminary injunction on an unregistered real estate, the current Civil Enforcement Act opens the way to finish an ownership preservation registry on buildings not in complete construction through simple procedure. But as this forsakes some interests in the registry law and administrative affairs, attention should be given to this as not to be abused, and applied correctly. Hence, this thesis explains necessary documents or procedures to get preliminary injunction on an unregistered real estate. It also deals some issues during the process, depending on buildings on construction, stage by stage, from practitioners perspectives so they can apply to these problems they face immediately and expecially to deal with inspection order of the status quo of the object by an executor separate from other processes as this is the most important issue. With regard to determination of indirect compulsory execution and execution of reparations thereof, this thesis explains how to calculate execution period in preliminary injunction ordering obligation of forbearance. Topics, such as whether the provision of Article 292 item 2 setting execution period of 2 weeks can be applied to preliminary injunction ordering obligation of forbearance, or otherwise this period deemed as starting from the time of infringement, when infringement continues, should be calculated as to start from delivery date of determination of a preliminary injunction or not, are introduced in this thesis with a view to draw appropriate conclusions after reviewing theories, rulings of cases and precedents in lower courts. Furthermore, as when preliminary injunction is cancelled, which makes the determinationof an entitlement of enforcement based on the preliminary injunction cancelled and makes an execution of reparations unable to enforce, unreasonable consequence eventually occurs, this thesis reviews how to effectively enforce reparations based on determinations of indirect compulsory execution and some problems regarding determination of indirect compulsory execution arising from preliminary injunction of inspection and copy on an account book. Lastly, with regard to provisional injunction against deliverance possession which is one of most easily issued preliminary injunctions in practice and affects the interest of a debtor, this thesis studies briefly some practical issues facing in the process of enforcement of provisional injunction against deliverance of possession, especially on cars or corporal movables.