초록

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to investigate the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory (the cost of financing increases with asymmetric information) among Korean retail firms from the perspective of debt capacity. According to the Pecking-order theory, a firm’s first preference is to use internal funds for its capital needs, its next preference is the issuance of debt, and its last preference is the issuance of equity; this is due to the information asymmetry problem between existing shareholders and investors. However, prior empirical studies, such as Lemmon and Zender (2010), argue that the entire sample test for the Pecking-order theory could be misleading due to the different levels of debt issuance capability of each of the individual firms; in fact, they confirm that the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory improves after taking into account the differences in debt capacity of the U.S. firms they examined. This paper implements a case study approach among Korean retail firms to examine the relationship between debt capacity and the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory in Korea. Research design, data, and methodology – This study uses the sample of public retail firms on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) from the time period of 1990 to 2013. We gather related financial and accounting statements from the financial information firm WISEfn. Credit rating information is provided by the Korea Investor Service. We employ the models of Lemmon and Zender (2010) and Son and Kim (2013) to measure a firm’s debt capacity. Their logit models use the rating dummy variable as a dependent variable and incorporate other firm characteristics as independent variables to estimate debt capacity. To test the Pecking-order theory, we adopt variants of the financing deficit model of Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999).In the test of the Pecking-order theory, we consider all of the changes in total debt obligations, current debt obligations, and long-term debt obligations. Results – Our main contribution to the literature is our confirmation of the predicted relationship between debt capacity and the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory among Korean retail firms. The coefficients on financing deficits become greater as a firm’s debt capacity improves. This is consistent with the results of Lemmon and Zender (2010). The coefficients on the square of the financing deficits are also negative for the firms in the largest debt capacity group, which is also consistent with the predictions in prior literature. Conclusions – This study takes a case study approach by examining Korean retail firms. We confirm that the Pecking-order theory explains the capital structure of retail firms more appropriately, after taking into account the debt capacity of each firm. This result suggests the importance of debt capacity consideration in the testing of the Pecking-order theory. Our result also implies that there has been a potential underestimation of the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory in existing studies.

키워드

Retail Industry, Pecking-Order Theory, Debt Capacity, Credit Rating, Debt Obligation

참고문헌(15)open

  1. [학술지] Booth, L. / 2001 / Capital structures in developing countries / Journal of Finance 54 : 87 ~ 130

  2. [학술지] Tendai Chimucheka / 2013 / Obstacles to Accessing Finance by Small Business Operators in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality / The East Asian Journal of Business Management 3 (2) : 23 ~ 29

  3. [학술지] Chirinko, R. / 2000 / Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure : A critical comment / Journal of Financial Economics 58 : 417 ~ 425

  4. [학술지] Frank, M. / 2003 / Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure / Journal of Financial Economics 67 : 217 ~ 248

  5. [학술지] Harris, M. / 1991 / The theory of capital structure / Journal of Finance 46 (1) : 297 ~ 355

  6. [학술지] Hussain Muhammad / 2014 / The Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan / 산경연구논집 5 (2) : 13 ~ 20

  7. [학술지] 김석진 / 2005 / 자금부족분을 이용한 자본조달순서이론 검정 / 경영학연구 34 (6) : 1829 ~ 1852

  8. [학술지] 구본일 / 2008 / 우리나라 기업의 자본구조에 관한 연구 : 절충이론과 순서이론의 비교 / 한국경제의 분석 14 (2) : 1 ~ 60

  9. [학술지] Lee, Won-Heum / 2001 / A study of the leverage adjustment speed hypothesis in large business groups / Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 28 : 87 ~ 114

  10. [학술지] Lemmon, M. / 2010 / Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories / Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45 (5) : 1161 ~ 1187

  11. [학술지] Shyam-Sunder, L. / 1999 / Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure / Journal of Financial Economics 51 : 219 ~ 244

  12. [학술지] 손인성 / 2013 / 부채수용력을 이용한 자본조달순서이론의 검정 / 국제회계연구 48 (48) : 153 ~ 180

  13. [학술지] 윤보현 / 2014 / 유통 상장기업들의 자본조달 특징에 관한 연구 / 유통과학연구 12 (10) : 75 ~ 83

  14. [보고서] Yoon, Bo-Hyun / 2015 / Testing of pecking order theory of the firms listed on Korean stock markets. working paper

  15. [학술지] 윤순석 / 2003 / 영업현금 및 자금수요원천과 자금조달정책 / 경영학연구 32 (1) : 203 ~ 231