초록

The main purpose of this paper is to defend Philippa Foot’s ethical naturalism from D.Z. Phillips and H.O. Mounce’s criticisms. The paper as a whole consist of two main parts. In Part I, I will introduce and explain Foot’s ethical naturalism. In Part II, I will defend Foot’s ethical naturalism from Phillips and Mounce’s several criticisms.

키워드

Philippa Foot, Ethical Naturalism, Emotivism, Non-Cognitivism, Phillips and Mounce

참고문헌(12)open

  1. [단행본] Ayer, J. / 1952 / Language, Truth, and Logic / Dover Publications

  2. [단행본] Copp, David / 2006 / The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory / Oxford University Press

  3. [단행본] Foot, Philippa / 2002 / Moral Belief in Virtues and Vices / Oxford University Press

  4. [단행본] Geoffrey Sayre-McCord / 1988 / Essays on Moral Realism / Cornell University Press

  5. [단행본] Hare, R. M. / 1991 / The Language of Morals / Oxford University Press

  6. [단행본] Hume, David / 2000 / A Treatise of Human Nature / Oxford University Press

  7. [단행본] Moore, G. E. / 2004 / Principia Ethica / Dover Publications

  8. [단행본] Foot, Philippa / 2002 / Virtues and Vices / Oxford University Press

  9. [학술지] Phillips, D.Z. / 1965 / On Morality’s Having a Point / Philosophy 40 (154)

  10. [학술지] Stevenson, Charles / 1937 / The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms / Mind 46 (181)

  11. [단행본] Sturgeon, Nicholas / 1988 / Essays on Moral Realism / Cornell University Press : 229 ~ 255

  12. [단행본] Sturgeon, Nicholas / 2006 / The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory / Oxford University Press : 91 ~ 121