초록

This paper analyzes the sentence-terminal suffix –ney in Korean and argues that it is a direct evidential marker. It criticizes Chung (2007, 2012) which argues that –ney is a spatial deictic present tense marker. She proposes that the spatial deictic tense in Korean induces an evidential environment and that the evidentiality itself is determined by evidential markers such as -ass-, -keyss-, or ø which immediately precedes the spatial deictic tense. This paper looks at Chung (2007, 2012)'s proposals and refutes them. It claims that the seemingly counter-examples to the evidential assumption for –ney can be explained without relying on Chung(2007, 2012)'s proposals. Governing domain of evidential markers, multiple marking of evidentials, and a distinction of reported evidential and quotation construction help to understand these examples.

키워드

evidentiality, present direct evidential, past direct evidential, indirect evidential, reported, quotation, governing domain, multiple marking

참고문헌(28)open

  1. [단행본] 고영근 / 1989 / 증보판 국어형태론연구 / 서울대학교출판부

  2. [학술지] 권익수 / 2013 / 한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미 재고찰: 정경숙(2012)에 대한 다른 생각 / 언어 38 (1) : 53 ~ 66

  3. [학위논문] 박재연 / 2004 / 한국어 양태 어미 연구

  4. [학술지] 박진호 / 2011 / 韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소 / 언어와 정보 사회 15 : 1 ~ 25

  5. [단행본] 손현선 / 1998 / 국어문법의 탐구 4 / 태학사 : 251 ~ 301

  6. [학술지] 송재목 / 1998 / 안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미기능에 대하여: 유형론적 관점에서 / 국어학 32 : 135 ~ 169

  7. [학술지] 송재목 / 2007 / 증거성(evidentiality)과 주어제약의 유형론-한국어, 몽골어, 티벳어를 예로 들어- / 형태론 9 (1) : 1 ~ 23

  8. [학술지] 송재목 / 2009 / 인식양태와 증거성 / 한국어학 44 : 27 ~ 53

  9. [학술지] 송재목 / 2011 / 한국어 증거성표지의 중복실현 / 비교문화연구 22 : 355 ~ 375

  10. [학술대회] 송재목 / 2014 / ‘-네’: 증거성, 인식양태, 의외성, 화자의 객관화 / 국어학회 제41회 전국학술대회발표자료집 : 161 ~ 174

  11. [학술지] 신선경 / 2001 / ‘–군요’와 ‘–네요’의 쓰임에 관한 연구 / 형태론 3 (1) : 69 ~ 84

  12. [단행본] 윤석민 / 2000 / 현대국어의 문장종결법 연구 / 집문당

  13. [단행본] 장경희 / 1985 / 현대국어의 양태범주연구 / 탑출판사

  14. [학술지] 정경숙 / 2012 / 한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서 / 언어 37 (4) : 995 ~ 1016

  15. [단행본] Aikhenvald, A. Y. / 2004 / Evidentiality / Oxford University Press

  16. [단행본] Aikhenvald, A. Y. / 2003 / Studies in Evidentiality / John Benjamins

  17. [학술지] Chung, Kyung-Sook / 2007 / Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean / Natural Language Semantics 15 : 187 ~ 219

  18. [학술지] Faller, Martina / 2004 / The Deictic Core of ‘Non-Experienced Past’ in Cuzco Quechua / Journal of Semantics 21 : 45 ~ 85

  19. [단행본] Givón, T. / 2001 / Syntax: An Introduction / John Benjamins

  20. [단행본] LaPolla, R. J. / 2003 / Studies in Evidentiality / John Benjamins : 63 ~ 78

  21. [학위논문] Lee, Hyo Sang / 1991 / Tense, aspect and modality: a discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective

  22. [학술지] Plungian, Vladimir / 2001 / The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space / Journal of Pragmatics 33 : 349 ~ 357

  23. [학술지] 송재목 / 2002 / A Typological Analysis of the Korean Evidential Marker -te- / 언어학 (32) : 149 ~ 166

  24. [학술대회] Song, Jaemog / 2011 / Evidentiality in Korean / presented at the Pre-JK Workshop

  25. [학술지] 송재목 / 2013 / EVIDENTIALITY, PAST, AND PERSON IN MONGOLIAN AND KOREAN / Acta Koreana 16 (1) : 67 ~ 85

  26. [학술지] Strauss, Susan / 2005 / Cognitive Realization markers in Korean: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence-ending particles -kwun, -ney and –tela / Language Sciences 27 : 437 ~ 480

  27. [학술지] Willet, Thomas / 1988 / A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality / Studies in Language 12 (1) : 51 ~ 97

  28. [단행본] Wise, M.R. / 1999 / The Amazonian Languages / Cambridge University Press : 307 ~ 340