ABSTRACT

Purpose - Recently, although corporate social responsibilityactivities have been increasing in size, they do not have to achieve qualitative improvements and can be passive and costconsuming. Therefore, companies should make quantitative aswell as qualitative improvements in their efforts in corporate social responsibility activities. In this study, the classification of social responsibility activitiesin a variety of studies was analyzed through a more specificpath than in previous studies. Corporate behavior image, socialbehavior image, and corporate contributions image were analyzed through a more detailed analysis of performance. This study suggests that more detailed and concentrated social responsibility activities be pursued by forming companies. Research design, data, and methodology- The purpose ofstudy is to gauge the corporate need for a more intensive, specific area of CSR activities. For this purpose, the sample ofconsumers that were targeted for CSR activities, recognized as261 persons, have been investigated. Through a theoretical discussion on previous research, nine hypotheses were establishedon corporate image, the influence of corporate performance onCSR, and the CSV regulation effect. In order to test the hy   -pothesis, a survey was conducted on 261 male and female consumers who were targeted for CSR, being persons in their 20sto 40s. PASW Statistics 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 were used forstatistical analysis. Results- Corporate behavior image was formed through le  -gal responsibility activities and economic responsibility activities. In addition to economic responsibilities, ethical responsibilitiesand environmental responsibilities were confirmed to have influ-ence on social behavior image. Corporate social responsibilityand philanthropic responsibility were confirmed to have influenceon economic contribution image. Corporate image has positiveeffects on brand attitude, corporate reputation, and corporatecompetition. In addition, when CSV awareness is high, consumers perceive corporate image only through economic responsibility. However, when CSV awareness is low, economic responsibilityas well as legal responsibility through charitable activities formthe corporate image that influences the brand attitude and corporate reputation, as well as corporate competitiveness. It wouldappear that the area of corporate social responsibility needsmore intensive management for corporate image and corporatecompetitive advantage. Conclusion- First, the findings of this study show that eachCSR activity has a different effect on corporate image and thus,the corporate image influences corporate performance in distinctways, depending on the CSR activity. This implies that reactivestrategies should be tailored to the required image. Second,there is a difference in CSV awareness between groups. Whenthe CSV awareness is low, we can confirm that legal responsibility activities have an especially significant effect on corporateimage, implying that corporations should pursue their economicobjectives within legal regulations and need to invest significanttime and effort for this. This study has limited generalization potential because the result of the model fit has insufficient reference value. In futureresearch, we need to approach various dimensions of corporate performance.

KEYWORD

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Image, Creating Shared Value, Firm Performance, Business Strategic

REFERENCES(52)open

  1. [jounal] Aaker, D. A. / 2004 / Leveraging the Corporate Brand / California Management Review 46 (3) : 6 ~ 20

  2. [book] Bae, Byeong-Ryeol / 2006 / LISREL structural equation model / Cheongram Press

  3. [jounal] 반혜정 / 2009 / 기업의 사회적 책임과 기업능력에 따른 경쟁우위 / 대한경영학회지 22 (4) : 2037 ~ 2058

  4. [jounal] Barich, H. / 1991 / A framework for marketing image management / Sloan Management Review 94 : 94 ~ 104

  5. [jounal] Barney, J. B. / 1991 / Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage / Journal of Management 17 : 99 ~ 120

  6. [book] Baskin, O. W. / 1988 / Public realtions: The profession and the pracitice / Brown & Benchmark Publishers

  7. [jounal] Brakus, J. J / 2009 / Brand Experiennce : What is it? How is it Measured? Does it affect loyalty? / Journal of Marketing 73 (1) : 52 ~ 68

  8. [jounal] Brian, D. T. / 2000 / Toward effective use of cause-related marketing alliances / Journal of Product, &Brand Management 9 (7) : 474 ~ 484

  9. [jounal] Brown, J. D. / 1998 / The environmentally concerned consumer: an exploratory study / Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice (Spring) : 39 ~ 46

  10. [jounal] Campbell, M. C. / 2000 / Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge : the effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent / Journal of Consumer Psychology 27 : 69 ~ 83

  11. [jounal] Carroll, A. B. / 1979 / A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance / The Academy of Management Review 4 (4) : 497 ~ 505

  12. [jounal] Carroll, A. B. / 1999 / Corporate social responsibility / Business and Society 38 (3) : 268 ~ 295

  13. [jounal] 최낙환 / 2011 / 기업연상이 소비자의 자아연관성과 개별브랜드의 충성도에 미치는 영향 / 유통과학연구 9 (1) : 5 ~ 15

  14. [jounal] Clark, Gregory / 1991 / Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor / The Journal of Economic History 51 (4) : 998 ~ 999

  15. [jounal] Dima, J. / 2007 / Corporate social responsibility(CSR) : Theory and practice in a developing country context / Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3) : 243 ~ 262

  16. [jounal] Forehand, Mark R. / 2003 / When is honesty the best policy? The effect of states intent on consumer skepticism / Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (3) : 349 ~ 356

  17. [book] Fombrun, C. J. / 1996 / Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image / Harvard Business School Press

  18. [book] Garbett, T. F. / 1988 / How to Build a Corporation's Identity and Project its Image / Lexington Books

  19. [jounal] Garriga, E. / 2004 / Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory / Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1) : 51 ~ 71

  20. [web] Giving Korea / Giving Korea 2013 The 13th International Symposium on Giving Culture / Beautiful Foundation

  21. [jounal] 한은경 / 2003 / 기업의 사회책임활동이 구매 의도에미치는영향에 관한 연구 / 광고연구 60 (2003) : 155 ~ 177

  22. [jounal] 허미옥 / 2008 / 기업의 사회적 책임, 이미지, 관계품질 그리고 고객충성도 간의 관계 / 한국비영리연구 7 (2) : 161 ~ 202

  23. [jounal] Hoyer, W. D. / 2010 / Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development / Journal of Service Research 13 (3) : 283 ~ 296

  24. [book] Kim, Gye-su / 2010 / AMOS 18 structure equation model analysis / Hannarae Academy Press

  25. [jounal] 김세중 / 2012 / 한국기업 CSR활동의 공유가치창출에 관한 실증연구 / 로고스경영연구 10 (4) : 1 ~ 28

  26. [jounal] 김성덕 / 2012 / 광고모델 특성이 구매의도와 브랜드태도에 미치는 영향 / 유통과학연구 10 (4) : 47 ~ 53

  27. [jounal] 김창곤 / 2013 / 광양제철소에 대한 지역 시민들의 기업이미지 분석: CFI를 이용하여 / 유통과학연구 11 (1) : 35 ~ 44

  28. [jounal] Lantos, G. P. / 2001 / The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility / Journal of Consumer Marketing 18 (7) : 595 ~ 630

  29. [jounal] Lassar, W. / 1995 / Measuring Customer-based brand equity / Jouanal of Consumer Marketing 12 (4) : 11 ~ 19

  30. [jounal] 이상민 / 2002 / 기업의 사회적 책임: 미국과 한국 기업의 사회공헌활동 비교 / 한국사회학 36 (2) : 4 ~ 32

  31. [jounal] Lee, Chong-Ho / 2000 / A Study on the Factors that Influence the Environmentally Concerned Consumption Behavior / Korean management review 29 (2) : 171 ~ 195

  32. [book] McGuire, J. W. / 1963 / Business and Society / McGraw-Hill

  33. [jounal] McWilliams, A. / 2001 / Corporate social responsibility:a theory of the firm perspective / Academy of Management Review 26 (1) : 117 ~ 125

  34. [jounal] Miles, M. P. / 2000 / Environmental marketing : A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage / Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3) : 299 ~ 311

  35. [jounal] 박현정 / 2012 / 기업의 사회적 책임활동과 공정무역제품 신뢰, 구매의도, 프리미엄가격 지불의도와의 관계 / 상품학연구 30 (7) : 103 ~ 122

  36. [thesis] Park, Kab-Joo / 2009 / The Influence of Corporate Image and Brand Image on Purchase Intention by Consumer Trust and Attitude

  37. [jounal] 박상록 / 2013 / 기업의 사회적 책임활동을 통한 이미지 형성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 / 대한경영학회지 26 (4) : 961 ~ 985

  38. [jounal] Park, Young-Ryeol / 2001 / A Comparative Study on Manager`s Ethical Consciousness Between Multinational and Korean Firms / The Korea Academy of Business Ethics 3 : 97 ~ 114

  39. [jounal] Porter, M. E. / 2003 / The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy / Harvard Business Review 80 : 56 ~ 68

  40. [jounal] Porter, M. E. / 2006 / Strategy and Society : The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility / Harvard Business Review 84 (12) : 78 ~ 93

  41. [jounal] Porter, M. E. / 2011 / Creating Shared Value : How to reinvent capitalism-unleash a wave of innovation and growth / Harvard Business Review 87 : 63 ~ 77

  42. [book] Prahalad, C. K. / 2004 / The Future of Competition: co-creating unique value with customers / Harvard Business School Press

  43. [jounal] 성현선 / 2010 / 기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업이미지 및 성과에 미치는 영향 / 서비스경영학회지 11 (2) : 25 ~ 47

  44. [jounal] 서구원 / 2008 / 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 유형이 기업평판, 사회적 연결감 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향 : 대학생의 실증연구 / 광고학연구 19 (4) : 149 ~ 163

  45. [jounal] 신강균 / 2003 / 기업의 사회적 책임활동(Corporate Social Responsibility:CSR)의 효과에 관한 연구: 유한킴벌리의 우리강산 푸르게 푸르게 캠페인(KKG)20년 활동 사례를 중심으로 / 광고학연구 14 (5) : 205 ~ 221

  46. [jounal] Waddock, S. A. / 1994 / Institutional owners and corporate social performance / Academy of Management Journal 37 (4) : 1034 ~ 1046

  47. [jounal] Waddock, S. A. / 1997 / The corporate social performance –financial performance link / Strategic Management Journal 18 (4) : 303 ~ 319

  48. [book] Wilkie, W. L. / 1994 / Consumer Behavior / John Wiley & Sons Publishers

  49. [jounal] Winters, Lewis. C. / 1986 / The effects of brand advertising on company image implications for corporate advertising / Journal of Advertising Research 26 : 53 ~ 63

  50. [jounal] 윤각 / 2005 / 부정적 언론 보도로 인한 위기 상황이 해당 기업과 브랜드의 명성에 미치는 영향: CSR(기업의 사회 공헌) 활동의 매개 역할을 중심으로 / 홍보학연구 9 (2) : 196 ~ 220

  51. [jounal] Yoon, Kak / 2007 / Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Multiple Stakeholder Relationships / The Korean Journal of Advertising 18 (5) : 241 ~ 255

  52. [jounal] 윤각 / 2003 / 기업의 사회공헌활동과 기업광고가 기업이미지와 브랜드태도 형성에 미치는 영향력에 관한 연구 / 광고연구 61 (2003) : 47 ~ 72