초록

Framework act on the management of charges says “the entity imposing or collecting charges, purposes of establishing charges, requirement for imposition, standards of methods for calculation or imposition rates shall be prescribed in a concrete and clear manner in Acts which serve as a basis for imposing charges: Provided, that details of requirements for imposition may be determined by Presidential Decree, Ordinance of the Prime Minister, Ordinance, Municipal Ordinance or regulations, as delegated by the relevant Acts after concretely determining their scope.”However it seems that a real standard to decide a validity of the charges depends on a judgement of the court. As it needs to make more sentences as standards of the charges concretely in Framework act on the management of charge, it is possible to review a validity of the surcharge on water use by a judgement of the court. The surcharge on water use is allowed as the requirement of charges: it has enough objectives of establishing to preserve the water quality in Han River water system to support the improving water quality project, the supporting the upper citizens, etc. And it has also an resonable rate to decide investment for the projects. Finally it has a legitimacy that it has been used to improve water quality and it returns the benefit to a payer.

키워드

Surcharge(Burden Charge), Framework Act on the Management of Charges, Surcharge of Water Use, User Pays Principle

참고문헌(32)open

  1. [학술지] 金性洙 / 2003 / 특별부담금의 정당화 문제 / 공법연구 31 (3) : 9 ~ 9

  2. [단행본] 김홍균 / 2010 / 환경법 / 홍문사

  3. [기타] / 2001 / 대법원 2001.8.24. 선고 2000두2716 판결

  4. [학술지] 박상희 / 2005 / 부담금의 법적 성질 / 공법학연구 6 (3) : 445 ~ 474

  5. [보고서] 박영도 / 2009 / 부담금 부과요건 등의 법정화 검토

  6. [학술지] 이준서 / 2009 / 토양환경보전을 위한 부담금제도의 도입 가능성 - 미국의 Superfund 사례를 중심으로 - / 재정법연구 2

  7. [단행본] 정하중 / 2005 / 행정법각론 / 법문사

  8. [학술지] 정호경 / 2005 / 소위 特別負擔金 槪念의 認定與否와 許容要件에 關한 小考: 헌재 2004. 7. 15. 선고 2002헌바42 먹는물관리법 제28조 제1항 위헌소원 사건을 중심으로 / 행정법연구 14 : 399 ~ 420

  9. [기타] / 1995 / 헌재결 1995.11.30. 94헌바40, 95헌바13(병합)

  10. [기타] / 1996 / 헌재결 1996.6.26. 93헌바2

  11. [기타] / 1996 / 헌재결 1996.2.29. 94헌마213

  12. [기타] / 1998 / 헌재결 1998.6.25. 95헌바35, 97헌바81, 98헌바5ㆍ10 병합

  13. [기타] / 1998 / 헌재결 1998.12.24. 98헌가1

  14. [기타] / 1998 / 헌재결 1998.2.27. 97헌마64

  15. [기타] / 1999 / 헌재결 1999.5.27. 98헌바70

  16. [기타] / 1999 / 헌재결 1999.01.28. 97헌가8

  17. [기타] / 1999 / 헌재결 1999.1.28. 97헌가8

  18. [기타] / 1999 / 헌재결 1999.10.21. 97헌바84

  19. [기타] / 2001 / 헌재결 2001.08.30. 2000헌마668

  20. [기타] / 2001 / 헌재결 2001.11.29. 2000헌바23

  21. [기타] / 2002 / 헌재결 2002.09.19. 2001헌바56

  22. [기타] / 2002 / 헌재결 2002.10.31. 2001헌바88

  23. [기타] / 2003 / 헌재결 2003.01.30. 2002헌바5

  24. [기타] / 2003 / 헌재결 2003.07.24. 2001헌바96

  25. [기타] / 2003 / 헌재결 2003.1.30. 2002헌바5

  26. [기타] / 2003 / 헌재결 2003.12.18. 2002헌가2

  27. [기타] / 2004 / 헌재결 2004.07.15. 2002헌바42

  28. [기타] / 2005 / 헌재결 2005.3.31. 2003헌가20

  29. [기타] / 2007 / 헌재결 2007.12.27. 2006헌바25

  30. [기타] / 2008 / 헌재결 2008.02.28. 2006헌바70

  31. [기타] / 2008 / 헌재결 2008.09.25, 2007헌가9

  32. [기타] / 2008 / 헌재결 2008.11.27. 2007헌마860