Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number

Dankook Law Riview

@article{ART001516427},
author={ Jae Kwang Kim },
title={Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number},
journal={Dankook Law Riview},
issn={1738-3242},
year={2010},
volume={34},
number={2},
pages={249-275},
doi={10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010}

TY - JOUR
AU - Jae Kwang Kim
TI - Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number
T2 - Dankook Law Riview
PY - 2010
VL - 34
IS - 2
PB - Institute for legal study
SP - 249-275
SN - 1738-3242
AB - The social number has been used as a basic data to identify all the people in the public sector, and the private sector. The protection social number does not mean protection from illegal use or abuse, but social number itself in the public sector or private sector to collect and delete. Therefore, the social number could not be protected effectively and systematically until the law makes principle of collecting them for what purpose clearly and specifically. To control the illegal use or misuse of the collected social numbers is not point. And G-PIN or I-PIN, one of the alternatives of social number to prevent the leaking private date on the web, should be considered whether they can be fundamental alternative, due to still risk of leaking private data. The plan of improving the current social number system is, the first, to improve the system of social numbers. It is proper that agency gives a personal identification number(ID number) with current social number(control number)still, when it issues a social number card, in order to minimize the social disruption according to its reform and improve it into cost-effective system. Second, they should establish guideline for the collecting and using social number in private sector. Because, the damage caused by collecting and using social number is larger and more threatening than that in public sector. Companies strongly tend to move to get the interests of the market. The business and information technology relevant to social number pursue interests definitely, rather than considering the personal rights or personality. Thus, legal ground is required to collect and use social number in private sector. Third, the government should allow to collect them according to laws through enacting integrated law for protection of personal information and revising current Protection Act of Personal Information, and force to implement alternative means instead of social number and coding measures.
KW - 주민등록번호(Resident Registration Number), 개인정보보호(protection of personal information), 주민등록법(Resident Registration Act), 개인정보자기결정권(self-determination right of personal information), 주민등록번호의 유출(the leakage of Resident Registration Number)
DO - 10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010
ER -

Jae Kwang Kim (2010). Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number. Dankook Law Riview, 34( 2), 249- 275.

Jae Kwang Kim . 2010, “Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number”, Dankook Law Riview, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 249-275. Available from: doi:10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010

Jae Kwang Kim “Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number” Dankook Law Riview 34.2 pp. 249-275 (2010): 249.

Jae Kwang Kim . Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number Dankook Law Riview [Internet]. 2010; 34( 2), : 249-275. Available from: doi:10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010

Jae Kwang Kim . “Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number” Dankook Law Riview 34, no.2 (2010): 249-275. doi: 10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010

HOME Archives View Article

Status and problems on collecting and using Resident Registration Number

Dankook Law Riview

Abbr : DLR

2010, vol.34, no.2, pp.249 - 275

DOI : 10.17252/dlr.2010.34.2.010

Publisher : Institute for legal study

Research Area : Law

Jae Kwang Kim¹

¹선문대학교 / jkkim314@sunmoon.ac.kr

Number of citation : 4 View APA Style

ABSTRACT

The social number has been used as a basic data to identify all the people in the public sector, and the private sector. The protection social number does not mean protection from illegal use or abuse, but social number itself in the public sector or private sector to collect and delete. Therefore, the social number could not be protected effectively and systematically until the law makes principle of collecting them for what purpose clearly and specifically. To control the illegal use or misuse of the collected social numbers is not point. And G-PIN or I-PIN, one of the alternatives of social number to prevent the leaking private date on the web, should be considered whether they can be fundamental alternative, due to still risk of leaking private data. The plan of improving the current social number system is, the first, to improve the system of social numbers. It is proper that agency gives a personal identification number(ID number) with current social number(control number)still, when it issues a social number card, in order to minimize the social disruption according to its reform and improve it into cost-effective system. Second, they should establish guideline for the collecting and using social number in private sector. Because, the damage caused by collecting and using social number is larger and more threatening than that in public sector. Companies strongly tend to move to get the interests of the market. The business and information technology relevant to social number pursue interests definitely, rather than considering the personal rights or personality. Thus, legal ground is required to collect and use social number in private sector. Third, the government should allow to collect them according to laws through enacting integrated law for protection of personal information and revising current Protection Act of Personal Information, and force to implement alternative means instead of social number and coding measures.

KEYWORD

주민등록번호(Resident Registration Number), 개인정보보호(protection of personal information), 주민등록법(Resident Registration Act), 개인정보자기결정권(self-determination right of personal information), 주민등록번호의 유출(the leakage of Resident Registration Number)

REFERENCES(15)

[jounal] 권건보 / 2004 / 주민등록번호제도의 문제점과 개선방안 / 공익과 인권 1 (2)
[thesis] 김민천 / 2009 / 안전한 전자정부 구현을 위한 I-PIN 정책 집행 과정 분석
[confproc] 김민호 / 2009 / 주민등록번호체계의 개편과 본인확인제도, 정보사회 신분확인제도의 법적 쟁점 / 제14차 미래정보사회 입법정책포럼 월례세미나 발표논문
[confproc] 김일환 / 2005 / 개인식별번호(주민등록번호)의 위헌성 여부에 관한 고찰 / 주민등록번호제도 이대로 좋은가? 토론회자료집
[jounal] 김일환 / 2005 / 住民登錄番號의 違憲性與否에 관한 考察 / 헌법학연구 11 (3) : 303 ~ 336
[other] 김정완 / 2010 / ‘민간분야 주민번호 수집ㆍ이용 엄격 기준’ 마련 추진”, 보안뉴스 2010.6.7. 기사
[book] 김재광 / 2010 / 전자정부법 / 한국법제연구원
[other] 김재섭 / 2008 / 인터넷 개인정보 최소화한다면서 이미 수집한 주민번호 고민은 없어, 한겨례, 2008.8.25. 기사
[jounal] 염홍열 / 2005 / 인터넷 상에서 주민등록번호 대체수단 발전방향 / 전자공학회지 32 (11)
[thesis] 이상명 / 2007 / 주민등록제도에 대한 헌법적 평가
[other] 이유지 / 2008 / 개인정보유출, 주민등록번호 수집이 문제 / 디지털데일리
[confproc] 이은우 / 2003 / 신분등록 및 주민등록제도의 개선방안, 국가신분등록제도와 프라이버시권의 충돌과 대안 / 건국대학교 법과대학 법학연구소 2003 학술토론회발표문
[jounal] 장종인 / 개인정보시장에서 주민등록번호의 이용 / 정보통신정책 17 (18)
[report] 한국정보보호진흥원 / 2007 / 주민번호 대체수단 서비스 개선방안 연구
[report] 한상희 / 2005 / 주민등록번호 사용현황 실태조사. 2005년도 인권상황실태조사 연구용역최종보고서

Statistics

icon 67 Viewed

Tools

icon Print this page

icon Download PDF

icon Export Citation

Sharing

icon Facebook

icon Twitter

Open Access