ABSTRACT

It belongs to each ministry’s authority under the overall control of the prime minister to interpretate the administrative Acts and their subordinate statue on the condition of judicial review. By reason of the above, the administrative disposition has special legal effects(for example; authentication power or default-free validity, self-enforcement power), different from legal act such as contracts between private persons, or private person and public subject. Anyway, I may come to conclusion on the following ground that the final and authoritative legal interpretation power within the government is exercised by the legislative agency under the name of prime minister, and that the power may be expended to the administrative Acts and their subordinate statue under the minister of justice, and the mandated regulations of local government. 1. The legal interpretation by legislative agency as a final-authoritative interpretation within government is similar to the legal interpretation of the supreme court. 2. Most citizen pay high trust and respect to the legal interpretation by legislative agency and they believe that it has quasi legal power based on §4 Administrative procedure Act. 3. The legal interpretation by legislative agency has a de facto effective power within the government and over the citizen, until the court judge it as false or against the based law. In addition, the commission on the legal interpretation shall be endowed with legal status and in the point of mutual respect between the national powers it shall be prescribed that the court may follow the legal interpretation by legislative agency without substantial evidence to prove the defect of it.

KEYWORD

법령해석(Legal Interpretation), 해석요구권(requirement right of inerpretation), 행정해석(Legal interpretation by the administrative), 입법해석(Legal interpretation by the assembly), 사법해석(Legal interpretation by the court), 행정각부의 통 할권(Overall supervision of the ministries)

REFERENCES(17)open

  1. [book] 김철수 / 2007 / 헌법학개론 / 박영사

  2. [book] 김남진 / 2005 / 행정법Ⅰ / 법문사

  3. [book] 오준근 / 1988 / 행정절차법 / 삼지원

  4. [book] 장영수 / 1997 / 민주헌법과 국가질서 / 홍문사

  5. [book] 정하중 / 행정법총론 / 법문사

  6. [book] 라드브르흐 / 1978 / 법철학 / 삼영사

  7. [book] 홍준형 / 행정구제법 / 한울아카데미

  8. [other] 법제처 / 2008 / 헌법주석서 Ⅲ / 법제처

  9. [jounal] 김광선 / 국무총리의 국무위원제청권과 행정각부 통할권에 관한 연구 / 중앙법학 6 (3)

  10. [jounal] 김동원 / 2003 / 블랙스버그 선언(Blacksburg Manifesto) - 행정의 정당성과 권력분립을 위한 행정가의 역할 - / 한국행정논집 15 (2) : 261 ~ 281

  11. [jounal] 김유환 / 2003 / 행정법 해석의 원리와 해석상의 제문제 / 법철학연구 6 (1) : 237 ~ 260

  12. [jounal] 오세혁 / 2003 / 한국에서의 법령해석 ―우리나라 법원의 해석방법론에 대한 비판적 분석― / 법철학연구 6 (2) : 119 ~ 150

  13. [jounal] 윤남순 / 2003 / 미국법에서의 제정법 해석 / 안암법학

  14. [jounal] 이규호 / 행정조정의 효력에 관한 연구 / 법조 50 (7)

  15. [jounal] 차강진 / 1996 / 법규범의 불확정성과 법해석 / 법학연구

  16. [web] 박상천 / 5.18 특별법 위헌 아닌 10가지 이유

  17. [book] 小早川光郞 / 2004 / 行政廳の第一次的判斷權⋅覺え書き, in 法治國家と行政訴訟 / 有斐閣