ABSTRACT
There is an amounting concern in Korea that the present charge system under which the debtor, the chargor, can't dispose of the charged assets in the ordinary of business without the consent of the creditor, the chargee, should be subject to reform. On the other hand, English courts have developed the law and theory of floating charge since 1870 when the case of Re Panama, New Zealand and Australian Royal Mail Company was decided. In order to get some lesson from english experience, this article explores into cases and materials of English floating charge. The essence of the floating charge is that the creditor, the chargee takes security over the debtor's present and future property but allows the debtor, chargor, liberty to manage the secured assets and dispose of them in the ordinary course of business free from the charge until its crystallization. As the floating charge enables the debtor to deal with his circulating assets freely in the normal course of business, it is indispensible to especially trading companies the most valuable assets of which aren't fixed ones but circulating ones, for example trading stock and receivables. There is an amounting need for non-possessory security interest over movables and the assignment of receivables financing, which could modify the rigidity of the current regime on secured transactions in Korea. By doing so, this type of new security would increase the availability of credit and improve the terms of the credit. But, the modernization and diversification of the collateral system in Korea should be promoted so as to implement the security interest on movables and receivables.
KEYWORD
Floating Charge, Crystallization, Floating Lien, Aggregate, Corporate Security
REFERENCES(31)
-
[jounal] 我妻榮 / 集合動産の讓渡擔保に關するエルトマンの提案 / 法學協會雜誌 48 (4) : 73
-
[book] 我妻榮 / 1953 / 近代法における債權の優越的地位 / 有斐閣 : 186
-
[web] / http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2006&no=421671 / 매일경제
-
[book] 류창호 / 2006 / 담보법제의 선진화를 위한 법제연구(I) / 한국법제 연구원 : 161
-
[book] 곽윤직 / 1992 / 민법주해(VII)」 / 박영사 : 258
-
[book] 곽윤직 / 2002 / 물권법 / 박영사 : 376
-
[book] 김상용 / 2003 / 물권법 / 법문사 : 773
-
[book] 강태성 / 1995 / 담보 물권법 / 경북대 출판부 : 324
-
[other] 김상용 / 물권법 : 773
-
[jounal] 김인유 / 2006 / 財團抵當制度의 改善方案 - 특히 工場抵當制度를 中心으로 - / 민사법학 (33) : 161 ~ 192
-
[book] 田中英夫 / 2000 / 英米法辭典 / 東京大學出版會 : 137 ~ 353
-
[book] Paul L. Davis / 1997 / Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law 6th ed. / Sweet & Maxwell : 359
-
[jounal] 김용길 / 2004 / 코먼로상 浮動擔保에 관한 考察- 英國, 美國 및 캐나다를 中心으로 - / 중앙법학 6 (3) : 237 ~ 265
-
[book] Pennington / 2001 / Company Law 8th ed. / Butterworths : 539
-
[book] Henry Campbell Black / 1991 / Black's Law Dictionary 6th ed. / West : 640
-
[book] Charlesworth / 1949 / The Principles of Company Law : 188
-
[book] Michael Bridge / 2002 / Personal Property Law, 3rd ed. / Oxford Univ. : 149
-
[book] Waldock / 1950 / The Law of Mortgages : 167
-
[book] Ali / 2002 / The Law of Secured Finance / Oxford : 52
-
[book] Connell / 1949 / Companies and Company Law : 180
-
[other] / 1867 / On our undertaking and property and receipts and revenue / re marine Mansions Co.
-
[other] / 1870 / On the undertaking and all sums of money arising therefrom, and all estate, right, title and interest of the company therein / in re panama New Zealand and Australian Royal Mail Co.
-
[other] / 1878 / On all the company's estate, property and effects / in re Florence Land and Public Works Co.
-
[other] / 1892 / On the company's undertaking and all its property whatsoever and wheresoever, both present and future / in re Brunton v. Electrical Engineering Corporation
-
[book] 水島廣雄 / 1997 / 特殊擔保法要義 / 八千代出版 : 66
-
[jounal] 박훤일 / 2003 / 美國의 浮動擔保制度 ― 우리나라의 擔保法制에 대한 示唆點 ― / 비교사법 10 (4) : 177 ~ 204
-
[book] Gerald L. Gall / 1990 / The Canadian Legal System / Carswell Calgary
-
[jounal] 泰光昭 / 1985 / 企業擔保と金融取引 / 擔保法大系(4) : 71
-
[other] / 일본상법 제415조
-
[book] 鈴木彌引 / 1984 / 金融取引法大系(5) / 有斐閣 : 200
-
[other] / 2008 / 법률 제8582호. 2008년 1월 1일 시행

