ABSTRACT

Nowadays probation is regarded as a developed criminal policy in that it corrects the abuses of short term penalty. But our judicial reality, probation exposes not a few problems because of vagueness of provisions and indiscreet application. Korean criminal law §62 is vague so, the impossibility of stay of execution depends on interpretation. To solve the problems of probation, first we have to revise the existing regulations clearly considering a second offense, general crime prevention and comeback of the accused without infection of evil ways. Admitting a stay of execution in case of monetary penalty is desirable due to the abuses of workhouse custody. To do this, first we have to introduce a stay of execution in case of monetary penalty legislatively. And split sentencing in case of monetary penalty should be accepted because it can reduce workhouse custody and judicial discrimination. But split sentencing in case of free penalty is not desirable because it results in infection of evil ways raher than reflection. In this case, it would better use current parole system and community-based treatments. It is not proper to admit split sentence in case of free penalty from criminal politic and analitic point of view. Recently Supreme Court sentenced that split sentence will be impossible under current regulation. The meaning of this sentence is that clear legislation is necessary to permit split sentence. Also the criminal law §62 is also vague, so interpretation is indefinite and there is a possibility of argument. There is a necessity of legislation improvement.

KEYWORD

probation, split sentence, short term penalty, monetary penalty, judicial discrimination

REFERENCES(24)open

  1. [jounal] / 1990 / “재산형 문제와 개선방향”

  2. [jounal] / 1995 / 자유형제도의 개선방안

  3. [jounal] / 1997 / 한국형법 Ⅱ

  4. [jounal] / 1990 / “유예제도에 관한 고찰”

  5. [jounal] / 1993 / 형의 집행유예에 관한 연구 형사정책연구원 보고서

  6. [jounal] / 법률신문제1814호1989.1.23 / “우리 형법상 일부집행유예의 선고가 가능한가?”

  7. [jounal] / 2001 / 집행유예제도 : 입법론적 비판과 대안 13 (1)

  8. [jounal] / 1992 / “형법개정안의 형벌제도에 대한 검토” 형사정책연구 제3권 제2호

  9. [jounal] / 2005 / 현행 집행유예제도의 발전방안 20집

  10. [jounal] / 2004 / 유예제도의 개선방안 -선고유예와 집행유예의 개선방안- (22)

  11. [jounal] / 2004 / 형법상 유예제도의 문제점과 개선방안 (22)

  12. [jounal] / 2000 / 刑法講義總論

  13. [jounal] / 2006 / 刑法總論講義

  14. [jounal] / 2005 / 刑の猶豫制度について - 宣告猶豫と執行猶豫 111

  15. [jounal] / 2003 / Criminal Law

  16. [jounal] / 1999 / Criminal Law

  17. [jounal] / 1984 / Die Freiheitsstrafe und ihre Surrogate im deutschen und aus lä (mos)

  18. [jounal] / 2006 / Strafgesetzbuch

  19. [jounal] / 2002 / Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil

  20. [jounal] / 2004 / Strafgesetzbuch

  21. [jounal] / 2004 / Strafrecht AT

  22. [jounal] / 2003 / Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze

  23. [jounal] / 1992 / ？Sanktionen ohne Freiheitsentzug？

  24. [jounal] / 1985 / “Teilaussetzung bei Freiheits und Geldstrafen”